-->

Translate

Saturday, March 31, 2012

An "Examine Yourself" Project on America - Marriage and Parenting

Greetings!
While checking out something else, I ran across this on snopes today:

The text that caused all the "hullabaloo" was a list of things supposedly published in a 1950's Home Ec textbook on how to be a good wife.  What caught my attention was not the issue of whether or not it was actually published in the textbook, but, rather, the reaction to the text itself.

Very interesting that these tips for being a good wife fit in perfectly with Scriptural principles on marriage, love, deference, putting others' needs first, seeking the good of the other, etc.  Also very interesting that in 1950, those things were already beginning to erode, but were still widely accepted, in both "church and non-church" circles.  Today, those things receive a strong reaction from women/men both inside and outside the Church.  

This has caused me to do an "Examine yourself" project (1 Cor 11:28, 2 Cor 13:5, Gal 6:4) on our nation today.  Have all this in mind as you view these statistics...


In this chart, I particular compared the statistics of 1950 and 1990 - virtually doubling, rising from 29.1 to 57.5 (a rise of 28.4).  This is in contrast to the previous 40-year period of 1910 to 1950, where we see it rising from 24.8 to 29.1 (a rise of 4.3).  Quite a contrast, and not without consequences.
 

This next chart is similar. However, it only covers 1970 to 2008, and gives the added information of the children affected.


Labor force participation of women by presence and age of youngest child, March 1975–2008, 1975–2008

graph of divorce rates, 1950-2000


Women's Liberation Movement Timeline

1848  
The world's first women's rights convention is held in Seneca Falls, NY, July 19-20. A Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions is debated and signed by 68 women and 32 men, setting the agenda for the women's rights movement that followed.

1855 Lucy Stone becomes first woman on record to keep her own name after marriage, setting a trend among women who are consequently known as "Lucy Stoners."

1859 The birth rate continues its downward spiral as reliable condoms become available. By the late 1900s, women will raise an average of only two or three children.
1945 Women industrial workers begin to lose their jobs in large numbers to returning service men, although surveys show 80% want to continue working. (A very interesting fact.  I believe the "Why?" of this is very important.)
1957 The number of women and men voting is approximately equal for the first time.   (The only date given for the 1950s.)

On this chart of significant womens liberation movement dates, a total of only 5 "movement" dates were given for the 40 year period of 1920 to 1960.  The time period beginning with 1960, including the next 36 years, (1960-1996), in contrast, shows 27 dates.  Lining up the "accomplishments" highlighted on this chart, you quickly see that the two top winners of issues having the most "progress" are connected with either abortion or employment.  What were virtual non-issues before 1950 bacame major off-the-chart issues over the next few years.

1960 The Food and Drug Administration approves birth control pills. 
1973 In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court establishes a woman's right to abortion, effectively canceling the anti-abortion laws of 46 states.
1981 Sandra Day O'Connor is the first woman ever appointed to the US Supreme Court. In 1993, she is joined by Ruth Bader Ginsberg (A tragic day for those upholding Biblical principles).
1993 Take Our Daughters to Work Day debuts, designed to build girls self-esteem and open their eyes to a variety of careers.

(Go back and review the Divorce Statistics chart.  Check out what happens during this same time period, 1960s through 1990s.  Now add in the information on the following charts.  Pay attention to the dates.) 
graph of unmarried fertility, 1950-2000 
graph of fertility rates, 1950-2005 
graph of marriage rates, 1950-2000

Add in these facts: 
Living Together Without Marriage  (These facts explain the decline of divorce shown in the Divorce chart above in the 1980s and 90s.  Partners living together outside marriage, who go their separate ways, do not show up on a divorce chart.  The effect is that the statistics indicate an improvement in the stability of marriages ... a misleading, false indication.) 
Over 12 million unmarried partners live together in 6,008,007 households. - U.S. Census Bureau. “American Community Survey: 2005-2007.”
The number of cohabiting unmarried partners increased tenfold between 1960 and 2000. - U.S. Census Bureau. “America’s Families and Living Arrangements: 2000.”
The number of cohabiting unmarried partners increased by 88% between 1990 and 2007. - U.S. Census Bureau. “America’s Families and Living Arrangements: 2007.”

Now subject these statistics to God's Word - the many commands and principles that are to govern a Believer's personal home life (marriage and parenting). These are easy to find with a good concordance.  Be sure to at least study many of them (if not all), in order to perceive the whole counsel of God's Word ... His opinion.

A recent poll conducted by George Barna shows only a 1 percent difference between divorce rates of Born-Again Believers and Non Born-Again Believers.  

Reflections on Marriage and Divorce by George Barna
George Barna, who directed the study, noted that Americans have grown comfortable with divorce as a natural part of life.
"There no longer seems to be much of a stigma attached to divorce; it is now seen as an unavoidable rite of passage," the researcher indicated. "Interviews with young adults suggest that they want their initial marriage to last, but are not particularly optimistic about that possibility. There is also evidence that many young people are moving toward embracing the idea of serial marriage, in which a person gets married two or three times, seeking a different partner for each phase of their adult life."
If anyone actually looks at all this, plus the Scripture, it is extremely sobering.  When Christians (speaking specifically of Christians here in America) virtually live their lives - especially the parts of their lives that can be seen and observed by the world - just the way their lost friends and neighbors live theirs ... is it any wonder that fewer and fewer people are being drawn to the Lord as Savior?  What do we actually show them that Christ offers?  If they read our lives, He doesn't appear to offer anything that will help keep families from falling apart, does He?  And in that, we are living lies and presenting to a lost world a God of our own making, rather than the God of the Bible ... a God Who does, INDEED, offer something that will keep our families together!  

Conclusion:  The ONLY solution....

"If My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land."
(2 Chron 7:14, emphasis mine)

My prayer today is that we, as God's people, will study His Word diligently - to show ourselves approved unto Him, without need to be ashamed, and able to handle Scripture rightly and teach it correctly.  (2Tim 2:15)  May we then humble ourselves and pray and turn from our wicked ways.  Then, and only then, can we experience God's forgiveness and healing in these vital areas of our lives - and begin to show a desperate world that God's ways DO work!  May it be so.  Amen and Amen.

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Does God "categorize" sin?

Greetings!  Here are a few of my searchings today.  



I'm sitting here wondering exactly what BIBLE Jimmy Carter was studying????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Even Joel Olsteen - who has made a name for himself as a positive and uplifting minister who focuses in on life’s pleasantries - acknowledges that the Bible clearly teaches that homosexuality is a sin!

In family discussions, we have often talked about this question.  Does God "categorize" sin?  Is all sin equal in God's eyes?  For me to understand the WHOLE counsel of God's Word (rather than just a portion of it), I often must look at an issue from more than one vantage point - studying as much Scripture as I can find on any particular issue, looking not only at verses that use a specific word, but also Scripture that gives a principle to be applied. (For example, I find several verses that use the actual word, "hospitality," but I also find Scripture that gives a principle to be applied to hospitality - such as Ephesians 6:7 or Colossians 3:23.)

When I search through the Word, I find that God's opinion on sin could accurately be interpreted as:  Whenever we do what WE want to do, rather than what God tells us to do ... that is sin.  (Isaiah 53:6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.  Romans 3:23  For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.  In 1 John 3:4,  “sin is the transgression of the law."  Proverbs 14:12  There is a way which seems right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.)  

One of the main Greek words translated as "sin" in our English Bibles is defined as, "missing the mark, doing wrong, wandering from the law of God" (http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G266&t=KJV).  Based on these Scriptures (and many more), ALL sin, ANY sin ... ANY and ALL behavior/thinking that is contrary to any command/teaching of the Word of God ... is - plain and simple ... SIN.  In that light, homosexuality is just like my choice to not show hospitality (or fill in the blank with any other sin); both are simply "sin."  Both have ample, clear teaching in Scripture (Lev. 18:22, 20:13; Romans 1, and 1 Peter 4:9, Hebrews 13:2, Romans 12:13).  They - and any other sin - are a definite "missing of the mark" set before us in Scripture, a failure to obey.

However (and this is a BIG however), this same Word of God does, indeed, "categorize" (for lack of a better word) sin.  God, Himself, out of ALL the ways that mankind chooses to go our own way, has given us a list of sins that He says are an "abomination."   For His own reasons, in His sovereignty, omniscience, and justice, He highlights these sins, using this word, "abomination."  Strong's concordance tells us this Hebrew word translated as "abomination" means:  a disgusting thing, abomination, abominable.  A look at Webster's Dictionary shows us this English word means:  worthy of or causing disgust or hatred : detestable.  That helps me to see that when I want to know what is "abominable" to God, I can expand my search to those things that He says He "hates," as well as those things He says are "abominable."  Doing a blueletterbible.org search for those two words yields quite a list of sins that God highlights in some way - above all other sin.  

Other places where God seems to focus on certain sins, more so than others, would included such Scripture as 1 Cor 6:9,10; Galatians 5:19-21; Romans 1:28-32; and 1 Timothy 3:2-5.  Why does God not include other sins (examples we could all think of) in these lists?  I do not know.  I believe His reasons might include the type of consequences these particular sins cause, and the numbers of other people affected by them.

So how do I apply this whole study to my own life?  As I thought and prayed my way through all of this today, three things came to my heart and mind.

1) God hates sin, of all kinds, because sin made the cross necessary.  As such, I must hate sin, also.  To the extent that I do, indeed, hate sin (evil), I will stay away from it!  No one has to force me to stay away from caviar.  I hate the very THOUGHT of it.  (I googled "the most disgusting foods" and caviar didn't even make the list!  Really?!)  Eating caviar - or any of those disgusting things that did make the list - would be, to me, quite gross and disgusting.  It takes no great show of willpower for me to stay away from them.  Why?  Because I hate them.  I hate even the thought of them.  This truth, applied to my spiritual life, is helpful in examining myself (which is commanded).  When I have the integrity and courage of heart to look at it honestly, it is quite sobering and compelling.

2)  Because of application #1, I must run in the opposite direction from anything I know to be sin. If I do not, I will suffer the consequences.  As I pondered this, a familiar saying came to mind.  Sin will always take me farther than I want to go, cost me more than I want to pay, and keep me longer than I want to stay.

3)  There are certain sins that should have an even greater "electric fence" about them than "all sin, in general - " because of what GOD'S WORD says about them. Those sins, discussed above, must be especially loathsome to me - whether or not I understand the reasons God has highlighted them. (Notice the above reads, "Those sins...must be loathsome to me," not the sinner committing the sin.) 


The sin of disobedience to parents - a sin often considered as rather minor in comparison - appears in one of God's "lists."  Again, perhaps it's because of the continuing consequences of that sin, as it then carries over into other major areas of life - our relationship with our Heavenly Father, employment, marriage, etc - and wreaks havoc, destruction, and pain.


If there is a sin, or sins, that I honestly can't claim to hate, then I must cry out with David (Psalm 51:10), "Create in me a clean heart, O God, and renew a right spirit within me!"  In and of myself, I can't even WANT the right things!  And with Paul, "Oh, wretched man that I am!"  But then comes the precious chapter of Romans 8!

Well, I'm out of time and energy.  

With you in the journey,

just a pilgrim